normal,bump,displace,.!!!!

Discussions about rendering in SOFTIMAGE©
User avatar
farhaad_yousefi
Posts: 178
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 20:45
Yahoo Messenger: farhaad_yousefi@yahoo.com
Location: tehran-iran

normal,bump,displace,.!!!!

Post by farhaad_yousefi » 24 Jul 2010, 23:28

hi is there any updated reference to explain the latest these 3 and which is which.!? and etc.! :ymdaydream:

User avatar
Maximus
Posts: 1121
Joined: 09 Jun 2009, 13:45

Re: normal,bump,displace,.!!!!

Post by Maximus » 25 Jul 2010, 00:41

uhm i dont think i got what you need !
you wanna know the difference between normals, bump, displacement?

User avatar
farhaad_yousefi
Posts: 178
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 20:45
Yahoo Messenger: farhaad_yousefi@yahoo.com
Location: tehran-iran

Re: normal,bump,displace,.!!!!

Post by farhaad_yousefi » 25 Jul 2010, 16:08

Maximus wrote:uhm i dont think i got what you need !
you wanna know the difference between normals, bump, displacement?
i kinda know what they all are(and need to update m knowledge) .. but when is the best to use which.!? and any new updates on them..inside xsi..any comparison ,any node update inside render tree.!? ~x( b-(

craft
Posts: 107
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 23:40
Location: Portugal

Re: normal,bump,displace,.!!!!

Post by craft » 26 Jul 2010, 00:22

doubt so buddy. they're still the same old bump normal and displacement data. i believe it's how shaders read them that will vary.
your objects' geometry approximation properties also come into play but that hasn't changed.

as to when use each: bump's faster than normal which's faster than displacement and i would say use the lightest one that fulfils your needs but have as high aesthetic standards as your render time budget can handle. So if you can solve things with bump do it. if it looks bad and really need a more drastic change involving sillouete and all that, use displacement. Layering a coarser displacement with one of the others might save you some render time.

ps. i suck at renders. :p

User avatar
farhaad_yousefi
Posts: 178
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 20:45
Yahoo Messenger: farhaad_yousefi@yahoo.com
Location: tehran-iran

Re: normal,bump,displace,.!!!!

Post by farhaad_yousefi » 26 Jul 2010, 06:39

craft wrote:doubt so buddy. they're still the same old bump normal and displacement data. i believe it's how shaders read them that will vary.
your objects' geometry approximation properties also come into play but that hasn't changed.

as to when use each: bump's faster than normal which's faster than displacement and i would say use the lightest one that fulfils your needs but have as high aesthetic standards as your render time budget can handle. So if you can solve things with bump do it. if it looks bad and really need a more drastic change involving sillouete and all that, use displacement. Layering a coarser displacement with one of the others might save you some render time.

ps. i suck at renders. :p

hi thiago ,wazaaaap man.!? ;)
considering your p.s if these are facts ;) you exactly gave me the answer i need.! thanks man.! \m/