video encoding - h.265
-
TheDutchOracle
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 26 Mar 2013, 10:32
video encoding - h.265
Hi guys, i have a video encoding question for a project that we are doing.
We have a prores 422 hq (2 minutes)
And we need to encode it to
H265
Yuv 420
10 bit LE
38 constant bit rate
UHD resolution (3840 x 2160)
(so no h.264, but the new h.265!)
Anybody any idea on how to do this?
Any idea would be welcome.
Thanks.
We have a prores 422 hq (2 minutes)
And we need to encode it to
H265
Yuv 420
10 bit LE
38 constant bit rate
UHD resolution (3840 x 2160)
(so no h.264, but the new h.265!)
Anybody any idea on how to do this?
Any idea would be welcome.
Thanks.
Amsterdam - Softimage 2013, "Some say the world will end in fire, some say in ICE".
-
tarkovsky
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 05 Oct 2012, 18:02
Re: video encoding - h.265
This?:
http://www.cinemartin.com/cinec/hevc-h265/
t
http://www.cinemartin.com/cinec/hevc-h265/
t
-
TheDutchOracle
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 26 Mar 2013, 10:32
Re: video encoding - h.265
too bad they don't offer a trial or demo.
they say they cannot guarantee it with XEON processors and 4K footage.
they say they cannot guarantee it with XEON processors and 4K footage.
Amsterdam - Softimage 2013, "Some say the world will end in fire, some say in ICE".
-
NNois
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 09 Jun 2009, 18:33
Re: video encoding - h.265
there is nothing that beat ffmpeg... give it a try ;-)
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.265
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.265
-
NNois
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 09 Jun 2009, 18:33
Re: video encoding - h.265
here are some more info for the x265 codec
http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html#libx265
http://x265.readthedocs.org/en/default/cli.html#quality-rate-control-and-rate-distortion-options
I assume too that you're client specified a 38 CBR (Mb ?)
if so you need to use --vbv-maxrate etc in place of the normal quantizer "CRF"
Hope this helps
http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html#libx265
http://x265.readthedocs.org/en/default/cli.html#quality-rate-control-and-rate-distortion-options
I assume too that you're client specified a 38 CBR (Mb ?)
if so you need to use --vbv-maxrate etc in place of the normal quantizer "CRF"
Hope this helps
-
tarkovsky
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 05 Oct 2012, 18:02
Re: video encoding - h.265
They can't guarantee what? Encoding? Sound a little strange.TheDutchOracle wrote:too bad they don't offer a trial or demo.
they say they cannot guarantee it with XEON processors and 4K footage.
Stupid with the disabled feature for trial...
-
luceric
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 21 Jun 2009, 22:08
Re: video encoding - h.265
couldn't you use Adobe Media Encoder, by renting CC for a month (75$?)
-
TheDutchOracle
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 26 Mar 2013, 10:32
Re: video encoding - h.265
it's not in media encoder yet.
We are attempting to recompile a version of ffmpeg et the moment.
We are attempting to recompile a version of ffmpeg et the moment.
Amsterdam - Softimage 2013, "Some say the world will end in fire, some say in ICE".
-
NNois
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 09 Jun 2009, 18:33
Re: video encoding - h.265
I'm pretty sure zeranoe builds had h265 support https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com
Are you sure ?
Are you sure ?
-
NNois
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 09 Jun 2009, 18:33
Re: video encoding - h.265
an I just checked the build coming from homebrew on a mac, then he has the h.265 support too ;-)
PS: on the mac you can install "homebrew" http://brew.sh/
then type "brew install ffmpeg"
PS: on the mac you can install "homebrew" http://brew.sh/
then type "brew install ffmpeg"
-
nDman
- Posts: 55
- Joined: 11 Jan 2013, 09:48
-
FXDude
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: 19 Jun 2012, 19:59
Re: video encoding - h.265
Don't know much about H265, but I know handbrake is pretty good,
Otherwise, H265 seems to currently have a few trade-offs.
Much smaller files for the same quality, and much higher maximum quality (virtually losless) including bit depth are the pros.
And Considerably longer encode times (5-10x more) and somewhat more decode performance seem to be the current drawbacks.
Seems pretty neat overall though.
Otherwise, H265 seems to currently have a few trade-offs.
Much smaller files for the same quality, and much higher maximum quality (virtually losless) including bit depth are the pros.
And Considerably longer encode times (5-10x more) and somewhat more decode performance seem to be the current drawbacks.
Seems pretty neat overall though.
-
NNois
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 09 Jun 2009, 18:33
Re: video encoding - h.265
what's uber cool is that handbrake / libav / ffmpeg / gstreamer / mplayer / vlc are all somehow fork of each others and use barely the same same opensource libraries.
Just learn one (ffmpeg is the most common) and you will learn how a command line tool can save your ass many times ;-)
Just learn one (ffmpeg is the most common) and you will learn how a command line tool can save your ass many times ;-)