General discussion about 3D DCC and other topics
-
nourvfx
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 24 Feb 2012, 02:02
Post
by nourvfx » 11 Jan 2013, 16:13
do you have any information about softimage 2014
pyro tools?
complate bullet dynamic?
muscle system?
full node base daynamic?
new hair?
new cloth?
new fluid simulator?
or new extrude tools for autodesk devloper.
Moderator edit: added a question mark to the title & moved it to Open Discussion - HB
-
Bullit
- Moderator
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 07:44
Post
by Bullit » 11 Jan 2013, 16:42
pyro tools?
What is this supposed to be?
-
Mr.Core
- Posts: 148
- Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 10:35
- Skype: giga-core
- Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Post
by Mr.Core » 11 Jan 2013, 17:08
I guess its related to houdini's fluid system "PyroFX", like fumefx
-
Clagman
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 16:28
Post
by Clagman » 11 Jan 2013, 19:16
Id be happier with broad fixes and updates to existing features and fewer major additions. So much new tech out there to put in for things like dealing with UVs, rigging/animation, ICE.
-
iamVFX
- Posts: 697
- Joined: 24 Sep 2010, 16:28
Post
by iamVFX » 11 Jan 2013, 19:21
bugs. more bugs
-
angus_davidson
- Posts: 583
- Joined: 20 Dec 2012, 04:13
- Skype: ithacapellin
Post
by angus_davidson » 12 Jan 2013, 05:48
90 Folks will have a preview at SIC in London on the 15th. Even with the NDA there hopefully should be some details coming through after that as and when Autodesk feels they are ale to let us know.
Personally I just hope for bugfixes, being able to use the stand alone licence that Maya uses in Linux and the eternally optimistic Mac version ;)
--
Technomancer at Digital Arts
Wits University
-
Rork
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: 09 Jul 2009, 06:59
- Location: Close to The Hague, Netherlands
Post
by Rork » 12 Jan 2013, 09:51
everybody testing is under NDA.
that's it.
-
angus_davidson
- Posts: 583
- Joined: 20 Dec 2012, 04:13
- Skype: ithacapellin
Post
by angus_davidson » 12 Jan 2013, 13:24
Call me an optimist. I don't believe Autodesk is that far removed from their user-base that all there will be no info apart from what is covered by the NDA. There are fine lines as Bellsy has said and then there are no lines.
--
Technomancer at Digital Arts
Wits University
-
nuverian
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 29 Sep 2011, 21:25
- Location: Greece
Post
by nuverian » 13 Jan 2013, 01:03
No I dont want bugfixes (because then, THAT will be the excusion)

I want viewport upgrade from legacy to modern.
Improvement in the animation workflow as well.
-
Bellsey
- Posts: 688
- Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 09:50
- Location: London, UnitedKingdom
Post
by Bellsey » 14 Jan 2013, 10:33
wow, I'm impressed. Normally we don't see a next release post/thread until late Feb, maybe March.

-
angus_davidson
- Posts: 583
- Joined: 20 Dec 2012, 04:13
- Skype: ithacapellin
Post
by angus_davidson » 14 Jan 2013, 11:00
We are impressive people ;)
--
Technomancer at Digital Arts
Wits University
-
Hirazi Blue
- Administrator
- Posts: 5113
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 10:15
Post
by Hirazi Blue » 14 Jan 2013, 11:12
@Bellsey - Our
My Wishlist for Softimage... maybe 2013 ? thread was started even earlier, on the 19th of October 2011.
And, besides, you should know by now, every other thread on this little community can easily qualify as a wishlist thread or a cry for help (or often both).

Stay safe, sane & healthy!
-
ace63
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 07 Jun 2009, 10:30
Post
by ace63 » 14 Jan 2013, 11:46
Maybe it's because of the disappointment in the 2013 release and no SAP last year that people get nervous ;)
-
McNistor
- Posts: 605
- Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 15:26
Post
by McNistor » 14 Jan 2013, 13:10
ace63 wrote:Maybe it's because of the disappointment in the 2013 release and no SAP last year that people get nervous ;)
No SAP made me optimistic - oddly enough.
My optimism spurs from the fact that we (I) never seen the new team in action and whatever is new has a 50% chance to be good. I'm not insinuating that the old team was bad, LOL, they made Softimage a cool s/w that we know it to be, but they're getting older and maybe their enthusiasm and main concern was not for Softimage any longer, but for better positions and salaries which is understandable.
The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.
-Thucydides
-
ace63
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 07 Jun 2009, 10:30
Post
by ace63 » 14 Jan 2013, 13:17
McNistor wrote:ace63 wrote:Maybe it's because of the disappointment in the 2013 release and no SAP last year that people get nervous ;)
No SAP made me optimistic - oddly enough.
My optimism spurs from the fact that we (I) never seen the new team in action and whatever is new has a 50% chance to be good. I'm not insinuating that the old team was bad, LOL, they made Softimage a cool s/w that we know it to be, but they're getting older and maybe their enthusiasm and main concern was not for Softimage any longer, but for better positions and salaries which is understandable.
I feel exactly the same - a new user team and therefore some new eyes looking at the code might shed some light on long-standing issues. I also think that not rushing a SAP release was a smart move.
-
nuverian
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 29 Sep 2011, 21:25
- Location: Greece
Post
by nuverian » 14 Jan 2013, 14:04
Seems some people are eager
