Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
-
ActionArt
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 17:23
- Location: Canada
Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
Is there any data on how well this chip renders? I'm curious.
-
Chris_TC
- Posts: 411
- Joined: 22 Mar 2010, 16:43
Re: Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
I would love to know this as well. All the reviews only seem to use Cinebench, and frankly I hate how it gives you a "score". I'm way more interested in a regular rendering benchmark with completion times.
-
ActionArt
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 17:23
- Location: Canada
Re: Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
Yes, I'm thinking about a new machine and benchmarks often have little to do with actual rendering performance. I'll love to see how it does with MR and 3Delight. The cores are different from the past so it's hard to guess exactly how it would do.
-
Chris_TC
- Posts: 411
- Joined: 22 Mar 2010, 16:43
Re: Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
Yes, I think they're not even technically "cores". They're called modules or something. Overall, performance of the strongest Bulldozer seems to be around an i5 2500, but I have a feeling it'll lead the i5 quite a bit in rendering applications.ActionArt wrote:I'll love to see how it does with MR and 3Delight. The cores are different from the past so it's hard to guess exactly how it would do.
Edit: Found a benchmark for mental ray and Vray. They're even using a scene that renders for more than 10 minutes, so the results should be quite accurate. Not looking too hot there.
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/842-14/ ... e-am3.html
-
scaron
- Posts: 119
- Joined: 08 Jul 2009, 03:16
Re: Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/100583-analyzing-bulldozers-scaling-single-thread-performance
same here, bulldozer cpu looks like a flop
s
same here, bulldozer cpu looks like a flop
s
-
ActionArt
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 17:23
- Location: Canada
Re: Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
Wow, that's terrible. Even worse than the Phenom II that preceded it! Sheesh! There's just nothing worth buying. I was hoping they'd really do something interesting this time around but I guess not. Damn!
Can't get a decent CPU. Can't use GPU rendering in any useful way. Processing power development has really stalled.
Now Intel has no reason to do anything significant. I guess renders just won't get any faster any time soon.
That cloud computing is looking better all the time
Can't get a decent CPU. Can't use GPU rendering in any useful way. Processing power development has really stalled.
Now Intel has no reason to do anything significant. I guess renders just won't get any faster any time soon.
That cloud computing is looking better all the time
-
origin
- Posts: 619
- Joined: 09 Jun 2009, 09:59
- Location: warsaw
Re: Anyone render tested Bulldozer yet?
Well, Intel's sandy bridge is about ~~15% faster than lynnfield (and overclocks better), and upcoming ivy bridge (march 2012) is supposed to be 20% faster than sandy bridge.