Bullit wrote:I would be more interested in questions asked than in what autodesk said. What artists in the top want from Softimage?
Hirazi Blue wrote:While I agree, the questions asked at that specific meeting might have been even more interesting than the specific answers provided by AD representatives, I really wouldn’t go so far as to start seeing those who were able to attend as the “artists in the top”. Those who were there quite simply were those who were able to attend. Nothing more, nothing less...
They themselves might see this differently of course...
While I agree it would be nice to hear what some of the artists might have asked, I doubt you will see anyone posting anything online until Autodesk makes the first move. There is most likely a strong possibility that the NDA was more of a sweeping NDA where whatever was discussed or brought to the table by either party is off-limits to anyone outside of the NDA agreement, and not just an NDA that states that one cannot mention what Autodesk was bringing to the table solely. The reason for this, is that if people who attended start posting the questions they asked, others can start to put the dots together, so to say, and deduce a possible conclusion of what took place at the event and formulate an opinion of where they see Softimage heading...just a possiblity that I thought about, I could be wrong.
