Interesting times ahead though.
Wonder if they'll adopt a new name - Foundology? Foundrolgy?
It's quite the opposite of what Autodesk gets when they do this, isn't it?Bellsey wrote:Certainly interesting for once to observe peoples thoughts and comments over something that doesn't involve Autodesk buying something.
Maybe there's a difference in what happens to technology Autodesk acquires and the one Foundry takes over..?Bellsey wrote:Sure, there's always alot of negative comments when it's anything Autodesk but that aside, from the various threads I've seen, many of the comments and peoples reservations are the same.
(Quoted from here)Brad Peebler wrote:We want to cast it as a merger because the word ‘acquisition’ makes people think the founders are going to cash out and leave, and nothing could be further from the truth—we’re jazzed about this and looking forward to having a bigger footprint in the industry.
When it comes to acquisitions and mergers (Autodesk or not). Many fall into the trap of coming up with idealistic and utopian like scenarios of what they would like to happen. Though of course whether anything actually happens, only time will tell.bottleofram wrote:Maybe there's a difference in what happens to technology Autodesk acquires and the one Foundry takes over..?Bellsey wrote:Sure, there's always alot of negative comments when it's anything Autodesk but that aside, from the various threads I've seen, many of the comments and peoples reservations are the same.
;)
But i have not seen too much blind enthusiasm about this merging, to be honest. At least not from people who ever took a peak into Foundry's pricing structure.
Check who owns Foundry. Yet another corporation growing biggerHirazi Blue wrote:"Funny" thing in all this, that everybody (myself included in the OP) is calling it a merger.
The cold hard truth of the matter seems to be that The Foundry has acquired Luxology.(Quoted from here)Brad Peebler wrote:We want to cast it as a merger because the word ‘acquisition’ makes people think the founders are going to cash out and leave, and nothing could be further from the truth—we’re jazzed about this and looking forward to having a bigger footprint in the industry.
And compare that to what happened on the DS side of the business, which was a total disaster.luceric wrote:what you do get when you merge company is more management overhead and politics. Softimage worked well under Avid where Avid ignored us completely because they considered not really part of their business. When they tried to help it wasn't so good.
So true. I always thought Luxology's main strength was that they had a clear vision and they could do what they want. Now that may be eroded.luceric wrote:what you do get when you merge company is more management overhead and politics. Softimage worked well under Avid where Avid ignored us completely because they considered not really part of their business. When they tried to help it wasn't so good.
Haha, yeah. Digital artists are simple like that. We never fail to overestimate what it means for an individual when something like this happens. For example, in this particular situation (and it applies to all other similar situations), the first thought of a current modo user might be: "Brilliant! Maybe now they can finally overcome the long-standing problems like linear workflow, massive data handling, shading, proceduralism or what have you". In reality, though, if any benefit to the end user comes, it wont come free. They'll just create a new product called "modoX" and sell it in a much higher price range.Bellsey wrote:When it comes to acquisitions and mergers (Autodesk or not). Many fall into the trap of coming up with idealistic and utopian like scenarios of what they would like to happen.bottleofram wrote:Maybe there's a difference in what happens to technology Autodesk acquires and the one Foundry takes over..?Bellsey wrote:Sure, there's always alot of negative comments when it's anything Autodesk but that aside, from the various threads I've seen, many of the comments and peoples reservations are the same.
;)
But i have not seen too much blind enthusiasm about this merging, to be honest. At least not from people who ever took a peak into Foundry's pricing structure.
Speculation is just an attempt to predict the future and be prepared for it. Its important, you know...Bellsey wrote:Though of course whether anything actually happens, only time will tell.
Yes but worth pointing out that The Carlyle Group is really a private equity firm who invest and divest in a diverse range of businesses all the time. Hardly a direct comparison to corps like Adobe, Autodesk, Dassualt, or Nemetschek AG (they own Maxon), whose business is concentrated in a particular sector or industry.origin wrote:Check who owns Foundry. Yet another corporation growing biggerHirazi Blue wrote:"Funny" thing in all this, that everybody (myself included in the OP) is calling it a merger.
The cold hard truth of the matter seems to be that The Foundry has acquired Luxology.(Quoted from here)Brad Peebler wrote:We want to cast it as a merger because the word ‘acquisition’ makes people think the founders are going to cash out and leave, and nothing could be further from the truth—we’re jazzed about this and looking forward to having a bigger footprint in the industry.