Not, I was giving an example. I talk about why I like Softimage, I have no background to talk about it technically as I'm no technical person and I take your word for it when you said that Softimage has ended it's run.luceric wrote:I think it is you who keeps using this year's VES and 98% Human as "proof" that XSI is technically superior.
But if there's something I know is film and it's not a fucking software that makes good film. The simple idea that you will win a OSCAR because you are in the field using Maya is idiotic at best. It's like saying you will win a OSCAR in lighting in the future because you film was shot with RED instead of film.
Gareth Edwards is directing Godzilla now because of his first film, which all effects were done with 3ds Max. Maybe if he used Maya he would won a OSCAR with that movie.
Read it again.PETA '98% Human' won a VES because the VFX was good and the story was also.
-- EDIT --
I see you added some things. So ... Jurassic Park won a OSCAR because Spielberg is an amazing storyteller and not because of Softimage 3D. Even if it won Best Special Effects. If the effects don't serve the story, the tech doesn't matter.