Newtek Lightwave 11 got GoZ before Softimage
Link - hxxp://www.newtek.com/features-lightwave-menu.html

On the other hand, they are shipping it as a new feature of the package while all other GoZ's are free downloads on pixologic site.

I said many times, though, it is kinda strange soft is being ignored. There must be a reason, just no one seems care enough to explain it. Would hate it to be just a case of "well, we are already supporting one too many autodesk application as it is... ughh "

All commercial software has now GoZ. The only excluded is softimage and silo. Daz3d, i.e., has GoZ. Pixologic give support to everyone would like implement GoZ (they share their SDK), seems they are not capable to doing it (don't have any employer/programmer who know Softimage?



I don't think is important where a feature becoming, what matter is can use it and work correctly.

From what I understand from the Mailing List: a dedicated "third-party" GoZ for Softimage seems to be in the works.
("Rumor" based on this thread)

I missed that one. Thanks for the heads up.

I really appreciate community effort, but the big company indifference (pixologic and autodesk itself) for softimage remains tangible.

afaik, GoZ for 3d Studio Max is also product of community, which probably means there is no member of zBrush team, experienced with Max, too.
If there is any relation, that would be Mudbox, hardly AD will help to competitors, as they already have app in same class. Imagine AD support for AVID Softimage crosswalk... I can't.

Is this as 'useful' as Send to max/mudbox?

They may have Goz but they still have to use Lightwave so we win

Poor Lightwave...



Don't know, I think is some approach: GoZ aromatically transfer data (geo, texture, correct displacement and normal) from Zbrush to other software, also, you can adjust topology on you application and update with a click geo in zbrush. Very fast and work correctly in modo.



I remember Pixologic publicized GoZ for max before release 4 like preview, so I think no, it is not a community work but was development by Pixologic itself.


Agree